Sexual harassment and victimisation surveys

En hand gör stopptecken

To what extent do employees feel that they are exposed to sexual harassment and victimisation at work?

Sexual harassment and victimisation are serious work environment problems that affect both the safety of individuals and the ability of organisations to create sustainable workplaces. In order to prevent and act, employers need to understand what victimisation looks like, how it can be measured and why different surveys sometimes give different pictures.

On this page, we summarise the latest results from the Swedish Work Environment Authority's Work Environment 2024 survey and the Harassment Survey 2024. Together, they show both the prevalence of sexual harassment and victimisation in working life, and how important it is to measure exposure both through direct questions and through questions about concrete behaviours.

Swedish Work Environment Authority survey

In the Swedish Work Environment Authority's survey The working environment in 2024, where people aged 16-64 who work have responded, shows that:

  • 4 % have felt that they have been subjected to sexual harassment by managers, colleagues or other people, such as customers, patients or students. The most common victimisation is by other people, followed by colleagues.
  • 18 % feel that they have been subjected to victimisation by managers, colleagues or other people, such as customers, patients or students. The most common form of victimisation is by managers, which about 8 % indicates, then by colleagues, approximately 7 %, and then by other people, approximately 6 %. Several answers were possible.

Harassment Barometer survey

The harassment barometer (Verian, formerly Kantar Sifo) examines, among other things, perceptions of sexual harassment. How to measure Degrees of victimisation matter according to the Harassment Barometer. In the survey, participants are asked whether they have been subjected to sexual harassment and whether they have experienced specific unwanted behaviours.

This is serious unwanted behaviour that is classified as sexual harassment.

The gross undesirable behaviours are:

  • Unwelcome touching of a sexual nature that is perceived as offensive.
  • Despite the fact that you have already said no, you have been repeatedly asked to meet in a way that is not perceived as purely friendly.
  • Inappropriate advances by colleague in social networks, such as chats and Facebook.
  • Unwelcome emails or text messages from a colleague of a sexual nature that were perceived as offensive.
  • Someone who, in a way that you found sexually offensive, showed you parts of their body.
  • Someone who displays images of a sexual nature in a way that was unwanted.
  • Sexual invitations to gain advantages in your work.
  • Someone who tried to force a sexual act with you.
  • Someone who tried to force a sexual act with you when you were either asleep or under the influence of alcohol or drugs.
  • Someone who forced a sexual act on you.

Results of the Harassment Barometer survey

To the direct question ”In the last 12 months, have you ever been sexually harassed in or around your work situation?” responds 2,6 % that they have been sexually harassed. Among women, the share is 3 % and among men 2 %.

At the same time, it states 13,3 % they have been subjected in the last 12 months to one or more of the serious unwanted behaviours classified as sexual harassment in or around the workplace.

When the answers to the direct question and the questions on specific behaviours are combined, the total 14 % have been sexually harassed.

Gender balance in the workplace matters

The Harassment Barometer also shows that gender diversity in the workplace plays a role in sexual harassment:

  • In workplaces with a gender balance 12 % of men and 14 % of women that they have been subjected to explicit sexual harassment and/or something that could be considered sexual harassment in the past 12 months.
  • In male-dominated workplaces 22 % of women and 11 % men that they have been victimised.
  • In female-dominated workplaces 15 % of men and 13 % of women said they had been victimised.

Not much difference between women and men's experiences

When it comes to the extent to which people have experienced the serious unwanted behaviour (which is classified as sexual harassment), there are small differences between women and men for most of the behaviours. For seven of the ten behaviours, men are more likely than women to say that they have been subjected to this in or around a work situation in the last 12 months.

  • Unwelcome touching of a sexual nature that is perceived as offensive: 7 % of women and 6 % of men say they have experienced this in the last 12 months in or around their work situation.
  • Despite the fact that you have already said no, you have been repeatedly asked to meet in a way that is not perceived as purely friendly: 5 % of both women and men indicate that this.
  • Inappropriate advances by colleague in social networks such as chats and Facebook: 6 % of women and 5 % of men.
  • Unwelcome emails or text messages from a colleague of a sexual nature that were perceived as offensive: 4 % of men and 3 % of women.
  • Someone who, in a way that you found sexually offensive, showed you parts of their body: 5 % of men and 3 % of women.
  • Someone who displays images of a sexual nature in a way that was unwanted: 5 % of men and 3 % of women.
  • Sexual invitations to gain advantages in your work: 4 % of men and 1 % of women.
  • Someone who tried to force a sexual act with you: 3 % of men and 2 % of women.
  • Someone who tried to force a sexual act with you when you were either asleep or under the influence of alcohol/drugs: 3 % of men and 2 % of women.
  • Someone who forced a sexual act on you: 3 % of men and 2 % of women.

Links to learn more

Read previous publications

I förgrunden en svart kvinna iklädd hjälm och reflexväst. I bakgrunden tre män med icke nordiskt utseende i samma kläder.

What are the attitudes of Swedish companies towards ethnic diversity among job applicants?

If a job applicant fulfils the formal requirements for a job, how do managers at Swedish companies think they themselves would be affected by the candidate's name, ethnicity, language and religion? Some aspects of the Järvaveckan survey stand out: a clear majority do not react negatively to foreign-sounding names. But almost nine out of ten would be negatively affected if the candidate spoke poor Swedish. And a large proportion would react negatively if the person has religious or cultural dress, Muslim beliefs or if

Read the full post »
Hjärna i plast, i flera färger, hjärnstammen är formad som stammen på ett träd.

What do the Swedish Work Environment Authority's new guidelines on ADHD and autism mean for employers?

Many workplaces are still designed around a rather narrow view of how we function, communicate and organise work. For people with ADHD or autism, this can create barriers in their day-to-day work - barriers that are not about skills, but about how work is structured, managed and monitored. There is a risk that skills are not fully utilised, with consequences for the work environment, performance and skills supply. At the same time, research shows that many work at least as

Read the full post »
Kvinna med svarta kläder och grått hår håller i ett föredrag.

Scouting: Risky not to invest in workplace culture

Employees and managers are an important asset in the workplace - that's why workplaces need to continuously invest in their culture. I meet workplaces where the wheels are turning at full speed and where people say they simply don't have time to work on their workplace culture. I also meet workplaces that have had, or are facing, downsizing, where they say that in this situation they cannot prioritise working on their culture. In both cases, this is a

Read the full post »
En hand gör stopptecken

Sexual harassment and victimisation surveys

To what extent do employees experience sexual harassment and victimisation in the workplace? Sexual harassment and victimisation are serious work environment problems that affect both the safety of individuals and the ability of organisations to create sustainable workplaces. In order to prevent and respond, employers need to understand what victimisation looks like, how it can be measured and why different surveys sometimes give different pictures. On this page, we summarise the latest results from the Swedish Work Environment Authority's Work Environment 2024 survey and

Read the full post »

Some books and reports on racism

What is racism? Racism is ideas, prejudices, attitudes but also actions and practices. Racism classifies ”people into different varieties attributed to particular inherited characteristics” and creates and ”maintains an unequal distribution of status, privileges, resources, rights and opportunities” and makes natural/self-evident ”the power order created by the principles of sorting, placement and distribution” (quote from the report Anti-Black Racism and Discrimination in the Labour Market by the County Administrative Board of Stockholm, 2018, pp. 15-16) There are different types of racism, for example

Read the full post »
Spelpjäser i många olika färger.

Survey on jargon and culture of silence

How do employees perceive the jargon in their workplace? And to what extent do employees feel that they are mistreated or subjected to varying degrees of offensive behaviour from their colleagues, managers or others in work situations? Harmful jargon In the Harassment Survey, 12 % indicate that at their workplace, to a fairly large or very large extent, there is jargon that people can take offence at. There is no difference between women and men's experiences. In the age group 18-29

Read the full post »